I have two broad, and related, areas of research: early modern (17th – 18th century) natural philosophy, with a focus on the relations between metaphysics and the life sciences; and early modern women philosophers. These two broad areas of research are reflected in four on-going projects:

(A) Generation, finality, and individuation: I'm interested in the challenge of explaining the generation of new living beings that confronted 17th and 18th century natural philosophers who are committed to the mechanical philosophy. This topic in the life sciences intersects in interesting ways with questions to do with individuation, and the role of final causes or teleology in natural philosophy.

(B) The philosophy of Emilie Du Châtelet: This is a collaborative project with Andrew Janiak (Duke University) which received past funding from the American Council of Learned Societies. It focuses on Émilie Du Châtelet’s natural philosophy, some questions in value theory (human happiness and virtue, for example), and the gendered context in which she forged her philosophy.

(C) Cavendish on Freedom: Genre and Philosophy: I am interested in the unusual conceptual space occupied by Cavendish’s philosophy in the early modern period. According to her, the natural and the normative are closely intertwined. My current research aims at understanding the impact of her unique system on her thinking about freedom. I'm also interested in how Cavendish's use of various genres enriches her philosophy.

(D) Freedom, Education, and Public versus Private Roles of Women:  I have interest in the theories of freedom of early modern women more generally, especially how ideas about freedom interact with theories about education and epistemic authority, including in the works of Gournay, Cavendish, Astell, Du Châtelet, and Wollstonecraft.